Archive for the 'Networks' Category

NLB’s ‘myLibrary’ Facebook App is damn shiok!

Sivasothi (@sivasothi) and Ivan Chew (@ramblinglib) tipped me off on the Singapore National Library Board‘s new Facebook app, simply called ‘myLibrary‘. What’s interesting about the app is that it integrates much of our typical library transactions right into Facebook.

At first we might wonder, “What’s the big deal about a Facebook app? Can’t we already access the same services by going to the library’s web site?”

True that, but more than just a matter of accessibility, it’s about being “within reach” to users, and extending their library use into the third place. Allowing users to recommend books to friends or posting what they’re reading directly onto their Facebook profiles is very much for the library’s win (i.e. word of mouth).

Since the Facebook app does require an NLB account to play with, I’ve made a quick five minute screencast above for the benefit of our international librarian friends (also on Youtube for the kiasu ones). If you can’t or hate watching videos, you can also read all about ‘myLibrary’ at NLB’s Facebook FAQ page, which includes a user guide (PDF) complete with annotated screenshots.

So far, the tweets about the ‘myLibrary” has been largely positive (many of whom were surprised!), so I do hope NLB keeps up the great work. I love our innovative librarians, and this in turn makes me proud of Singapore.

UPDATE 1: Some folks have asked if NLB has plans for mobile apps, and while there’s no official word, my sources have quietly hinted in due time. Meantime, we can always point our iPhones to http://m.nlb.gov.sg

UPDATE 2: If you’re so inclined, Ivan Chew (@RamblingLib) has shared screenshots of NLB’s myLibrary Facebook app.

Conference: The Internet as Playground and Factory (Nov 12-14, 2009)

"Internet as Playground and Factory" conference (Nov 12th-14th 2009)

Media activist, educator and human-connector, Trebor Scholz, has opened registration for his present-future conference, The Internet as Playground and Factory.

If you haven’t guess it, this conference is based on the idea of digital networked labor as it questions whether we are being exploited through our everyday online activities. I often get asked how web services like Youtube and Facebook are “free for use”, so this conference is set to explore what we actually trade in return, be it our individual privacy or labor within privatized commons.

As seen from Trebor’s conference introduction:

[...] The revenues of today’s social aggregators are promising but their speculative value exceeds billions of dollars. Capital manages to expropriate value from the commons; labor goes beyond the factory, all of society is put to work. Every aspect of life drives the digital economy: sexual desire, boredom, friendship — and all becomes fodder for speculative profit. We are living in a total labor society and the way in which we are commoditized, racialized, and engendered is profoundly and disturbingly normalized. The complex and troubling set of circumstances we now confront includes the collapse of the conventional opposition between waged and unwaged labor, and is characterized by multiple “tradeoffs” and “social costs”—such as government and corporate surveillance. While individual instances are certainly exploitative in the most overt sense, the shift in the overall paradigm moves us beyond the explanatory power of the Marxian interpretation of exploitation (which is of limited use here). [...]

This reminds me of what iconic Obama street artist Shepard Fairey once said in a CBS news feature: “It’s not appropriate for only advertisers to own the public graphic communication space”. Extending Fairey’s idea across all realms, we are living in an era where all public space is being commodified. Is the situation worse online?

Trebor’s been working on the digital labor idea since I was a student of his, and he’s gathered a formidable force of around 84 artists and academic thinkers (including esteemed friends Alex Halavais, Chris Barr and Stephanie Rothenberg) to discover how legitimately concerned about exploitation we as digital natives should be.

It’s FREE (monetarily at least) to participate, goes from Nov 12th to 14th, and will be held at The New School, Eugene Lang College in NYC (Google map). You’re invited to register and for your convenience, I’ve created an upcoming.org event for it so you can easily add it to your iCal and Google calendars.

Pending available accommodations, I am planning be there to help cover the event. If you’re thinking of going and would like a buddy to introduce you around, drop me a comment. BTW, I found the perfect t-shirt to wear for such an event.

On Tiananmen’s 20th anniversary: How China is becoming a Giant Singapore

Tiananmen Square protests of 1989
The Tank Man: Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 – Jeff Widener (The Associated Press). Also see NY Times “Behind the Scenes: Tank Man of Tiananmen

You might be aware that I’ve been on a blog hiatus since I writing on my dissertation on Cyberactivism in China. With the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square this week, I’d like to brain dump what I’ve come across so far. Please let me know what you think.

When veteran filmmaker Antony Thomas went to China in search of “The Tank Man“, he showed this iconic picture to undergraduates at the Peking University. Back in 1989, this university served as the nerve center of the Tiananmen Square protests.

None of the students recognized the photograph.

Lacking any context, the four Chinese students mustered their best effort and proposed that it was some kind of military parade (watch 1 minute into video). Continue reading ‘On Tiananmen’s 20th anniversary: How China is becoming a Giant Singapore’

Watch Henry Jenkins discuss Transmedia Storytelling (video)

Henry Jenkins is the director, Comparative Media Studies Program at MIT. In this viral-info-snack he discusses the power of media in a 21 century trans-mediated world. A world where converging technologies and cultures give rise to a new media landscape.

Thanks to the ever wise Cross-Media Specialist @ChristyDena, I checked out Henry Jenkin’s short video on transmedia, which discusses the origin of media and how it’s transformed today. The video showcases much of the phenomena I’ve been illustrating in my recent presentations on the social web.

Starting with storytelling shared within tribes, it goes onto the modern day commercialization of media owned by a few powerful conglomerates, and finally today’s re-tribalized media which is reproduced and remixed by anyone handy with digital tools as well as participates in online social networks (e.g. Youtube, Facebook). Evidence of this remix culture can be seen in Youtube spoofs of major events such as the Gitmo torture and the Obama campaign.

More importantly, Jenkins discusses the emergence of transmedia, which is an affordance of such democratic media tools. In short, transmedia refers to the idea that a story can be told across various media. A popular example would be The Matrix, where the story is told across three movies, an animation series, a video game and so on. Extending further, we could also consider fan-made works as part of the transmedia experience, where we see variations (e.g. spoofs) produced and shared by fans all over the world.

In summary, today’s experiences are best served flowy. It’s not just about letting content be in the hands of fans, but enabling them to remix them in their own image. This participatory way of production isn’t simply fan-inclusive; it invites them to help us sustain our stories beyond our means.

Starting the social media journey for communication agencies

Social Media Primer @ Travers Collins & Company (panorama)
Click to see full-size panorama

Looking back at the emergence of popular social networks, I’m quite convinced that much of their success happened not through incredible planning and foresight, but by accident and adaptation. Youtube was supposed to be a video-based HotorNot.com, Flickr was spawned off a MMORPG multiuser chat service with real-time photo exchange (called FlickrLive; I was there), and Twitter was meant to be a “livelier” Livejournal.com

As serendipitous as this may be, we can still take time to observe the tendencies of social networks. Explaining this at Buffalo PRSA back in February, Kate Torok kindly invited me to give a social media primer for her colleagues at Travers Collins & Company (TC&C) on Tuesday morning.

The night before, I spent some time examining their online network presence, by checking out their professional group blog TC&C insights, their twitter @TraversCollins, as well as their LinkedIn company profile page which neatly displays their employee roster.

Social Media Primer @ Travers Collins & Company By around 8.45am, twenty-two friendly faces had descended around me at the TC&C conference room. Surveying the room, I was delighted to know that they all had experience with twitter as well as Google Reader. Soon after, I noticed that John Pitts @Pitts88 and @schoenorn tweeted in while I presented. I wished more of them did the same, so we’d have a backchannel for sustaining post-session discussion.

Since Travers Collins & Company is an all-rounded communication agency handling advertising, public relations as well as investor relations, I showcased my Phelps vs. Kellogg’s case study (as seen at Buffalo PRSA), with a few extensions towards user engagement and social media tracking tools.

Technology actually comes last
I kicked off the session by showing an explosion of social web services out there. While there are @#^$-tons of social networking platforms already available, I reinforced the idea that that strategy should always come before tools. A better way to understand this, would be to see Forrester’s POST (People, Objectives, Strategy, Technology) method where, ironic to many, the technology component comes last in the online social engagement effort.

The POST Method: A systematic approach to social strategy

Listening actually comes first
For organization embarking on the social web journey, there’s the temptation to broadcast and focus on getting as much eyeballs as possible. I’d argue that this method simply bootstraps traditional communication limitations onto the new media of social networks, which actually offers us new ways of engaging individuals. Instead, I’d recommend listening as the primary method of engagement. It’s the most natural (and respectful) way to start a conversation, create strong relationships and build advocacy. Particularly since we live in a much noisier online environment today, someone who actually takes the time to listen becomes a big deal. We’re more receptive of people who empathize with us.

Twitter / Thomas At UPS: @brainopera Good Afternoon ... For instance: For the past week, I’ve been trying to resolve a “delivered” package via UPS… the problem being, I never received it. Checking between the shipper and UPS, it seems that someone “took” the package left at my door. It’s strange since I usually get InfoNotices whenever I miss a delivery.

While I might have to file a police report, along comes @ThomasAtUPS offering an ear. It’s obvious that he watches “UPS” related tweets. While he couldn’t do anything to help me then, it’s nice to know that I have a real person inside UPS to rely on, instead of talking to random service reps over the phone. Think about it: Never before in communication history have organizations ever been afforded such precise omniscience and omnipresence over their namesake as today.

Media Monitoring the Social Web
From my previous internship with PR agency, Weber Shandwick Worldwide, I had first-hand experience with the tedious aspect of mass media monitoring. Add the surveillance of social networks, and what could be relatively interesting can quickly turn into pure drudgery. Thankfully, with more news and conversations being shared online, I showed that it is getting easier for us to track what mainstream media as well as individual users are saying about particular ideas. At the basic level, there are free tracking tools on the web such as Google Alerts and SocialMention. On the higher level, there are intelligence gathering services which would index the raw keyword search results into measures of online sentiment (e.g. ScoutLabs, JamiQ).

Scoutlabs: sentiment analysis tool

Taking online tracking even further, the ability to predict future events might no longer be stuck in the realm of science fiction. Horizon scanning, as defined by UK government scientific advisors, involves “the systematic examination of potential threats, opportunities and likely future developments, which are at the margins of current thinking and planning. Horizon scanning may explore novel and unexpected issues, as well as persistent problems or trends” (Sept 2004). While governments have long realized the value of horizon scanning, a recent example included the fairly accurate prediction of the H1N1 flu epidemic by Northwestern University and Indiana University (New York Times, May 2009). Imagine if we had such predictive powers to watch over our interests.

History of Individual-Authority Relationships
Beyond listening, organizations can also engage and enlist users/fans in a more proactive way. I shared a historic overview of the stages of relationships and interactions individuals have had with organizations, going from Ladder of Citizen Participation (Sherry Arnstein, 1969), to Forrester Research’s Social Technographics reports (Charlene Li, 2008). I also highlighted Mike Arauz’s infamous “Spectrum of Online Friendship” to illustrate the idea of friending in the online space, and how such friends could be measured in terms of personal investment.

Where do we find the time?
Towards the end of my presentation, most of the questions pertained to finding the time for social media. There might never be enough time, let alone people, to manage multiple client accounts and their relevant social media endeavors. The short answer is that we should come upon the social web as natural extensions for our cause. Once again, the technology should come last, as it should aid, not detract from, the larger strategy of our cause.

One possible and quite commonly cited workaround which participants suggested included paying bloggers to write about their clients. First and foremost, there’s the danger of turning blog campaigns into nothing more than the act of shilling, or worst case scenario, astroturfing. I warned that with so many pairs of eyes on the Internet, it would almost be unavoidable for someone spot or even whistle-blow such an affair online, thereby damaging the client’s reputation.

I suggested looking for alternative ways to encouraging participation. This includes looking for the experts or influencers in fields relevant to the campaign, then approaching them with information which would be of interest to them. If it’s worthwhile, sponsoring bloggers for a period of time would be a better idea than simply paying for blog posts (e.g. PayPerPost), so long as bloggers know to be honest by disclosing their sponsorship in the post. A good example given by Courtney Quattrini (correct me if I’m wrong) was how she noticed that rapper 50 Cent had his ghost-twitterers sign off with initials, so fans wouldn’t feel short-changed thinking that it’s actually him tweeting. For most fans, it’s simply about the principle of showing respect.

From Communicating to Socializing
Finally, I got to sit-down with TC&C’s social media team, consisting of Kathy Burns, Alyssa Mayer, Caitlin Waas, and Courtney Quattrini. This four-woman team manages TC&C’s blog and twitter account. They are also responsible for advising colleagues and clients on the inclusion of social media practices into their communication mix. They wanted me to be brutally honest with how they could improve in the social web front. For new entrants to social media, I could think of three quick points for them to consider:

1. Link, and Link Widely
While TC&C’s company blog was professionally written, with individual writers’ personality showing through, I noted that great content might not be enough to be noticed. I believe that being on the web, we would really have to link and cite others as widely as possible, not simply to make an educated case, but to recognize other personalities online. Done modestly, most professional bloggers would see inbound links to their site, and might even reciprocate with a comment or a link back as well. It’s a conversation starter.

2. Riding the Brain Waves
As Malcolm Gladwell once noted, there are essentially two kinds of geniuses out there: The Precocious (or born genius) and the Late Bloomer. He noted that while being born genius is amazing in itself, it is far more efficient to consider developing many more late bloomers. In effect, not all of us might be able to create a sensation on our own, but many more of us know how to ride it and hopefully learn from it. Done in moderation, understanding the ebb and flow of conversations online and participating in them would be a way for new comers be introduced in new social circles. The idea is not to write simply in void, but to situate our own personality and creations in a common space with others. It’s a give and take situations, and humility can be a powerful, recognizable virtue. Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh made sense when he said that “People relate to people, not companies“.

3. The Perpetual Beta
Most organizations might get hooked on the idea that they have to look perfect right from the start. Those of us in the web world know that unlike the mainstream media where you publish once and disseminate, the web is more like an organic space where ideas survive by being continuously adaptive. Unlike traditional media, the web is a space where you can actually hold multiple conversations. Understanding this means shifting the paradigm of communications towards the idea where speed and humility rules over perfectionism and authority. I’d even argue that imperfection gives people the sense that you’re as human as them, which is why some of the more interesting bloggers are those who share their best and worst of times. It’s the journey tells the story, not simply the success. On a related note, there’s an interesting documentary being produced by Melissa Pierce called “Life in Perpetual Beta” which I hope to catch.

Telling it like it is…
I don’t profess to be a social media expert, so these are brief heartfelt thoughts I have to share. There are many more developed ideas worth exploring from many others worth following, but I do hope these points provide a rough guide on how to think about the social web. The bottomline is that we can’t simply bootstrap traditional communication practices onto the social web if we wish to make the best from it. We’re going back to basics, working with real people who share our interests, so we ought to make our adventures a mutual investment.

Despite the Internet, geography still rules…


Click image to enlarge

As seen in my Facebook social graph, my online relationships tend to be clustered more by geography than shared interests.

To clarify, these shared interests would include events or communities, since all of this can take place in either virtual (e.g. hobbyist forum) or physical (e.g. community center) locations.

In the 90s, Barry Wellman did a related study on one of the world’s first “always-on” Internet suburbs called “Netville“. During his early visit to UB, I recalled him relating an irony of how we communicate predominantly with our physical neighbors, despite us being afforded the ability to base our communication on mutual interests with anyone in the world.

I would surmise that physical proximity still has a higher significance on our communication due to the increased potential impact (threat) it could have on our well being (survival).

See if this is true for you. Try generating your own social graph, then label your clusters. The denser cluster should be ones that are geographically centered. If you can, upload your screenshot to Flickr, then tag it: facebookclusters

UPDATE 1:
Okay so this might not be the most valid test, but it gets us thinking. Chris Lott pointed out how…

  1. The choice of Facebook for experiment skews the results, making them narrowly applicable to FB not one’s actual social network
  2. not to mention the obviousness of geographical proximity as a major force in friendships which reflect on SNs…

I would half-agree.
For the first point on the disassociation of online vs. real-life networks, I believe that given sufficient friend connections on Facebook, it would still serve as a decent sample/proxy of our real-life relationships. I did consider factors such as the digital divide, but with an increasingly broader demographic of Facebook participants, this might not impact the test as much as we might imagine. Having chatted/interviewed with a small number of new and senior Facebook users, most are amazed at how many of their friends are already there.

On the second point of obviousness of geography as cause for friendship, I relate back to the idea of the test: To see if the Internet truly encourages us to communicate (including relationship formation) on shared interests regardless of proximity. In essence, the online space would allow for geographic friendships to compete with shared interest friendships, yet geographic ones still appear as denser clusters.

A caveat for using Facebook to test how we center our communication online, would be that friending on social networking services are single-action triggers, and are unrepresentative of longer-term communication. For a more accurate test, I’d need to be able to measure who we tend to talk to (nodes), how often we do (frequency), and where that person resides (location).

I’m still trying to find a better way to conduct this Facebook test, so lets consider this a pilot. Now if we take that the average no. of Facebook friendships to be about 164, then a friendship corpus of about 200 or more should suffice for this test.

Do note that I find friendship counting irrelevant, because our current architecture of social networking services naturally grows our connections. That is, it’s easier to make connections, yet more work to break them. We’re never going to stop meeting new people throughout our lives. Interestingly, while I consider myself an active friender online (currently 620 FB friends) , my geocentric network clusters still hold true!

Here are submissions from my friends…

Joe Hsu / @jhsu / 491 Facebook friends

Denice Szafra / @denidzo / 123 Facebook friends

@denidzo said “yes, but while problematic, it does indicate that I don’t randomly friend people- that I mostly talk to people I already know.”

November Tan / @micamonkey / 836 Facebook friends / 4yrs of Facebook use

Among her thoughts, November said “I find it interesting that my family network runs in parallel clusters. One for each side of the family!”

Jeremy Foo / @echoz / 308 Facebook friends / 2yrs of Facebook use

Jeremy said “I would think that my clusters are based upon events in life rather than location. Its more often than not a classification system that is familiar to you.”

I did consider whether the classification of shared interest and location was arbitrary, since both could be mutually inclusive. An event would be an example of a situation where both coincide. However, since shared interest could exist in physical and virtual place, it’s still fair game.

As iffy as this sounds, I’ll need to compare more social graphs out there, so do contribute your annotated screenshots:
1. Generate your own social graph.
2. Label your clusters by shared interest and location.
3. Upload your screenshot to Flickr, then tag it: facebookclusters.
4. Include your friend count and how long you’ve been using Facebook.

Finally, let me know how you’d improve the test. Also let me know if you’ve found any network tool that lets me get at the data points I’ve mentioned. Thanks!

Changing the way I use twitter…

Lunch with @KeithBurtis & @jhsu

Over lunch at the classy Black & Blue (map), I finally got @KeithBurtis and @jhsu to see why I was disturbed by the way I was using twitter. There was an imbalance, and I sought to fix it.

As we munched on our lunch special Kobe Beef Burgers, I mentioned how I was losing grip on how personal twitter used to be. As twitter grew in popularity, so did the number of friends and followers I made. I believe that since I was an early adopter of twitter, and taught classes where I had students try twitter, I had exceptional traction which propelled my numbers even higher. Folks looking at the decent follow count might think that I’m actually interesting to follow, and by late 2007, I had crossed the holy 1,000 follower count.

1,000 twitter followers later...

As with blogging, having a larger audience came with a conscious responsibility to share more value with my particular twittersphere. Since I produce content over a variety of services, and since I was lazy, I used third-party twitter services like Twitterfeeder to send my flickr, del.icio.us as well as blog posts from here, automatically as tweets. The key idea was to have my twitter stream consistently (and automatically) productive.


The 5 Stages Of Twitter Acceptance by @rohitbhargavaMr. Tweet Blog

Combined with the ever-handy Socialtoo service, I could get an email report of twitter users who followed and unfollowed me on a nightly basis. I did use Socialtoo’s auto-follows and auto-DMs at first, but that was what trigger the sudden realization of how I was losing my twitter identity: I had become a faceless twitter user. While basic users (including bots) use twitter as a dumping ground for links (sometimes lifestreams), highly engaged users made everything personal by being more conversational; an passage from blogging all over again.

I was using twitter like I was on speed, pumping out hard and fast…. the numbers had seduced me:

Twitter Nutrition Facts
14 Updates/Day
42% Conversation
50% Links
1196 Followers
701 Friends
1.7 Ratio
courtesy of Mr. Tweet

Pragmatically, most would say that the conversation is a signature of being human, which in itself is a value which we cannot yet reproduce mechanically simply by constantly tweeting links. The reward of twitter was that our connections felt alive whenever someone @replies (reciprocates).

In a low-resolution environment of 140 characters, I thought I could get by with being human through a simple machine. On the contrary, twitter was about the celebration of being human, and I had a choice whether to partake in it. The humor, spelling typos and mis-directed links, all added to the texture of twittering much like the beautiful flaws of an oil canvas painting.

Granted everyone has the freedom to tweet as they like, though the cost of which comes in the unfollows. While @jhsu noted how twitter works best for quick, short alerts, @KeithBurtis reminded me that there’s a difference between sharing vs blurting (great article!). We were in agreement to how we tend to get sucked into the game of numbers, where the natural inclination was increase followers/friends across social networking services.

At some point, some of us get jaded. That’s where we fall back into the primal way of communication, herein returning to the close knit friends who tend to reciprocate more so than others. An effort had to be made to save my twitter sanity…

So I began pruning.
Reducing noise, stress.
Remembering less is more.

Keith joked that he did the same, and by removing irrelevant followers, it gave him that fresh hair cut feeling. He used Twitter Karma, which lets you see your followers’ last posts in a glance, amongst other stats. Since I needed to unfollow a ton (bad case of auto-follows), I preferred MyCleenr, which lists followers based on how long ago their last tweets were. Those who haven’t tweeted in more than a year, went straight to the delete bin, while the remaining corpus were visually inspected over time.

As silly as this sounds, now I feel reborn.

I’ve even started blogging in person again. The way I previously used twitter drained away all my love for thinking things through. All I had cared about was fitting everything into 140 characters. Life became too fast, thoughts became too bite-sized. I essentially felt dumb and numb, and it had a larger impact on the way I perceived things than I had realized.

In a Buddhist kind of way, to be happy on twitter, meant making others happy too. And to be true and honest, Keith’s advice was to talk to someone without an agenda. For me, the biggest move was to ignore the numbers and just enjoy life. Just like how some of us used to blog, we could either live it up and be ourselves, or be encumbered by the wants of others, letting the number of unfollows pull you down.

Lastly, be sure to read David Pogue’s experiences with twitter… there’s truly an uncanny resemblance!

Facebook Strategies Workshop 2.0 [Freshly Presented]

Facebook Strategies Workshop 2.0

Back in February, I presented a workshop entitled “Facebook Strategies for the Classroom“. Looking back, it didn’t seem to have the “strategy” that was promised.

This afternoon, in collaboration with UB Librarians Bridget Schumacher and Karen Walton Morse, we presented our new and improved Facebook Strategies workshop to 32 participants, ranging from research faculty to administrative staff.

We first took into account their workshop expectations, which could be summarized into 1) Marketing techniques, 2) Building communities, 3) Privacy / Security, and 4) Motivating quality academic work.

Second, we took our real-life Facebook outreach experience and laid them out as viable case studies as seen in the agenda above.

Judging from the evaluations, I think the workshop was well-rounded, hitting the right notes. However, some of our sections might have been shortened to keep interests going. I particularly enjoyed sharing personal stories, especially on the privacy aspect of Facebook.

No, there are no slides, no video or audio recordings, just the agenda which has links for your convenience. If you’d like to know more, just join in our Facebook group and take note of the links on the Discussion Board.

Trebor Scholz’s Cautionary Note on Social Media (via Howard Rheingold)


Warning: curl_setopt() [function.curl-setopt]: CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION cannot be activated when safe_mode is enabled or an open_basedir is set in /nfs/c03/h01/mnt/56076/domains/theory.isthereason.com/html/wp-content/plugins/blipit/bliptv.php on line 30

As seen on Howard Rheingold’s vlog:

Whenever people refer me to pseudo-critics of social media (i.e. Andrew Keen), I refer them to Fred Turner or to Trebor Scholz, who actually know something about what they are criticizing. I recommend Scholz’ paper, What The MySpace Generation Need To Know About Working For Free for those who want to learn more.

It’s nice to see a familiar face on an Internet celebrity’s blog. If you recall, I participated in Trebor’s graduate seminars last year and took in various readings on how electronic networks change the way we live. I saw an iterative pattern, from the telegraph to the social web, towards how we coordinate ourselves throughout history. The only real change to me though, is complexity.

I believe that as networks get more complex, motivations and agendas become more implicit. With that, I picked up Trebor’s perspectives on the dark side of the social web, especially since most of what we hear online seemed one-sided towards the excitement of online social networking (is the proper term “in-selling“?).

It’s easy to get lost in the crowd when the mob is blindsided by the various pleasures of socializing, from the simple action of adding friends on Facebook, to more deliberate action of joining in a video lipdub. Thing is, do we question the larger agenda? Who gains the most out of this implicit labor? Does it matter if users know? Are we becoming intellectual lemmings?

One of Trebor’s key arguments (which I share) is the idea of social networks being locked-in (what I call a walled garden), where users might not realize how time and labor invested on such platforms might not be exportable. As such, greater use would mean less likelihood of one leaving the network, essentially being trapped. Our collective action in such networks turns into free creative labor for the site owners, from which is used to attract even more users (i.e. network effect).

There has been effort on the opposing end to liberate our personal identity (including our media) across networks, such as the Data Portability initiative, which a few major companies have agreed to partake in. It remains to be seen how generous social networks like Facebook and MySpace will be, in risking their already enormous population of captive users.

theorycast.42 :: When SmartMobs Go Wrong…


Warning: curl_setopt() [function.curl-setopt]: CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION cannot be activated when safe_mode is enabled or an open_basedir is set in /nfs/c03/h01/mnt/56076/domains/theory.isthereason.com/html/wp-content/plugins/blipit/bliptv.php on line 30

While having our Saturday brunch at The Washington Market in downtown Buffalo, Shady, Ken Fujiuchi and I chat about how the ease of participation online has subsequently given rise to collective action (e.g. Smartmobs), which has mostly been seen as either efficient or entertaining.

In recent history, the same could also be said of antagonistic forms of collective action, where greater forms of anarchy online spills over into the real world mostly in the form of psychological attacks. For instance, see CNN: From flash mob to lynch mob and Anti-Tibetian attacks on Chinese student: Grace Wang.

Though this current scenario could be argued in various ways, I offered the pretext of Samuel Huntington’s “Clash of Civilizations” (1993) as a way to understand why some cultures seem to challenged by practices of online democracy. Dubbed as Internet hate machines by some, such discourse could possibly be located around Anonymous (group meme) and 4chan (English version of Japanese 2chan) as examples. For a reality check, Shady mentioned how even in the pre-Internet days, such collective participation and its follies have been observed in places such as town hall meetings.

How do we reduce or even resolve frictional, unethical powers on the Internet?
While we’d like to hope that a Darwinian approach would naturally have online societies “sort themselves out”, some civilizations have been concerned that they might not survive this phase and have taken steps to manage it, such as through legitimate forms of Internet regulation (e.g. China). We discuss its immediate environment and challenges involved.